Obama Newsweek Cover |
Same-sex
marriage has been in the news a lot lately. North Carolina voted to ban it,
along with civil partnerships, and a day later Obama held an interview where he
voiced his personal support for same-sex marriage. Although I am frustrated
at the limits of the support Obama gave, I also understand that it is a pretty
big symbolic victory, particularly considering the fact that we’re right in the
middle of election season. I also understand those people who are heaping
praise on Obama and are unwilling to criticize his statement as perhaps not
going far enough. I get it.
What I do not
get is the new Newsweek cover
and the article by Andrew Sullivan declaring that Obama is the “first gay
President.” Obama is the first black President, except that actually apparently
Clinton was first given that title. And that, right there, illustrates the
problem with tossing around such titles. It implies that no actual gay man (or in Clinton’s case, no
actual black man) will be able to become President within our lifetimes. It
implies that the flack Obama is getting for supporting same-sex marriage is
somehow equitable to the crap a gay man would have to put up with while trying
to run for President. Similarly, when Clinton was called the “first black
President,” it implied that his situation was somehow similar to the situation
a black man (such as Obama) would be in when he tried to run for President.
I understand
these labels are meant as praise, but really they just seem to be attempts at
grabbing media attention. And I suppose that by writing this I’m just giving
them what they want.
This was also published at The Good Men Project.
This was also published at The Good Men Project.
No comments:
Post a Comment