Well, I
think two things are happening. First is the way that Obama’s administration
can’t win with conservatives, regardless of what he does. You can argue all you
want about whether it’s because of his race (it is), and whether it’s just
because the Republicans are just playing politics and trying to make their
opponents look bad (it’s that too). Regardless of why it’s happening, it is
happening. No matter what Obama does, Republicans will find something to
oppose, even when it’s something as inhumane as suggesting that the Obama’s
plan to prevent rape shouldn’t go forward.
Second
though is the way in which the U.S. has stopped prioritizing spending money on
social issues. For the sake of argument, let’s say that we don’t actually have
the money necessary to implement these new policies. That should, in itself
spark some outrag. The proper response to that is to question and decry a
system that is financially unable to protect the people it has forcibly imprisoned.
That is a broken system. We should be demanding that the system is fixed, not
attacking people who are trying to fix it.
Let’s
take a look at where we can cut spending and be more financially responsible (I’m
looking at you wars in Iraq and Afghanistan), and let’s find the money we need
to protect our prisoners. If the problem with implementing necessary social
policies is “we don’t have the money,” then the next step should be to figure
out how to find the money. "It's too costly," is not an acceptable argument against implementing policies that will keep people safer. After all, even the Republicans would agree that protecting
its populace is one of the most important roles of government. I’d say that
should include protecting prisoners from sexual assault.
No comments:
Post a Comment