On November
4, 2008 I sat in a pub in Durham, U.K. with a bunch of other U.S. students
watching the election results come in with anticipation. However, unlike most
of those other students, my attention wasn’t really focused on whether Obama
would be elected or not. I kept waiting to hear about the results from the
three states that had ballot measures banning same-sex marriage. I was
particularly anxious about my home state of California. Up until just a couple
weeks before the election I had been sure that the ban would be shot down. It’s
California, one of the most liberal states in the country. Yet as I sat in that
pub, refreshing a website with election data every 30 seconds, I was really
worried. The Yes on 8 Campaign had seemed to be so much more successful than I
had thought it would be.
With the time
difference (California is 8 hours behind the U.K.) I stayed up extremely late,
not wanting to miss the results. I don’t remember exactly what time the results
on California’s Prop 8 were officially announced. It might have even been the
next day. What I do remember is that when I saw that it had passed, my heart
sank.
It wasn’t
long before people in California started protesting, and then that protest
became nationwide. Not long after that the NOH8 campaign was started,
specifically in response to the passing of the ban on same-sex marriage in
California. On the one hand it was heartening to see such a reaction. On the
other, I was left wondering where such an outpouring of support was before the
elections had even happened. And I realized that I wasn’t the only one who had
thought California would never pass the ban. We were surprised, shocked and now
we were ready for action.
--------------
Fast forward
to today and the Pewstates.org's Marriage Map and four more states have upcoming elections in which a
ban on gay marriage will be on the ballot. What initially struck me about it is
the fact that the majority of states actually have a ban in place. Also, it’s interesting
that after the passage of DOMA, states still feel the need to pass an explicit
ban. It’s not as if without the ban, same-sex marriage is legal. Same-sex
couples weren’t getting married in the U.S. prior to these marriage bans.
In countries
where same-sex marriage is legal, it’s only legal because of a change in the
law or because of the ruling in a court case. Something had to change to make same-sex marriage
recognized by the state. It suggests to me that a lot of these bans are based
on fear, specifically a fear that if a same-sex couple wanted to get married in
a state without a ban, it might be possible for them to find a way to do so.
Also, I think
it’s amazing how different states seem to be in completely different places. Seven
states are trailblazing by passing laws which explicitly make same-sex marriage
legal, and 41 other states are firmly sticking to the old nuclear family model.
It’s as though different parts of the country have different ideas of where
best to look for guidance. Seven states seem to be looking to the future,
embracing change. The other 41 seem to be nostalgically looking into the past,
trying to force U.S. culture and society to stop, and turn back the clocks.
Don’t get me
wrong, I think it is part of the beauty of the U.S. that each region is not
overshadowed by another, but at the same time same-sex marriage is a matter of
human rights. For my mind, regional differences in morals and cultural norms
should not overshadow human rights.
This was also
published at the Good Men
Project.
Update May 8: For a more comprehensive look at LGBT rights in the U.S. look here.
Update May 8: For a more comprehensive look at LGBT rights in the U.S. look here.
No comments:
Post a Comment