I often hear from people who don’t want to
raise taxes that, in America, we’re a capitalist economy in which we should be
able to keep what we earn. I’d argue that is only partly true. We all remember
and like to talk about the Boston Tea Party and about how it was a protest
against unfair taxes. It’s proof, we say, that even during the Revolution, we
were against taxes. What we often forget are the Articles of Confederation, the
short-lived government in place among the newly independent colonies after the
Revolution. There were a few problems with it, and a few reasons why it failed,
but one of them was that it had no ability to levy taxes. Turns out having no
taxes are just as detrimental as unfair taxes.
As much as we
might not like it, taxes are necessary for a strong federal government. Money
is power, as they say, so without any money our federal government wouldn’t be
able to do anything. After the Great Depression, the social responsibilities our
government took on expanded, and kept expanding. Health care, retirement,
building infrastructure, national security, military, welfare, and a myriad of
other public services have all been put in place as a means to create a better
society. And these services need funding, and that funding largely comes from
taxes. So, as Stephen King says, tax the rich more. Let’s keep the important
public services that help underprivileged or disadvantaged groups in our
society. Tax the rich so that those programs can stay in place.
Of course,
along with this is the responsibility for the government to cut down on
spending that’s excessive. And we certainly have a problem in the U.S. of
over-spending. I just don’t think it’s an either/or situation. The solution to
our financial woes isn’t to tax the rich more or cut down on spending. The solution is to do both.
No comments:
Post a Comment